|
How much of the cost of a remodeling
project can be recovered at resale? Our annual report samples
current conditions in 35 markets.
Homeowners
contemplating a major remodeling project are mostly interested in
what the work will cost, when it will get started, and how long it
will take to complete. Also on the list is how much their investment
will add to the value of their home. The importance of resale value
varies depending on the overall state of the housing industry and
local market conditions in particular. Homeowners are usually more
concerned about property values in a buyer's market, when existing
homes are slow to sell. When housing sales are strong, resale value
plays less of a role in their remodeling decisions, because
homeowners are more confident of recovering their money. But
homeowners are also concerned that their remodeling plans don't
price their home out of the neighborhood.
Our annual Cost vs.
Value Report attempts to quantify these concerns by comparing
cost-to-construct with added resale value for a selection of the
most common remodeling projects. This year, like last, the Report
targets the 35 cities listed as top remodeling markets by the
Harvard University Joint Center for Housing Studies.
And again like last
year, certain of the sample projects include both a mid-range and an
upscale project description. The goal is to provide remodelers with
a range of data between two sets of cost and value figures that can
be used to help set customer expectations. The upscale project
descriptions detail how the two versions differ as to square
footage, use of high-end finishes, and other factors that affect
costs. The higher upscale costs serve to remind customers how
decisions about size and scope affect a project's cost.
Where we get the
data
|
Percentage of Cost Recovered |
|
|
National averages |
Variance, |
|
|
2003 |
2002 |
2002-2003 |
|
Deck
Addition |
104.2% |
* |
* |
|
Siding
Replacement |
98.1% |
79.1% |
19.0% |
|
Bathroom
Addition, Mid-Range |
95.0% |
94.2% |
0.8% |
|
Attic
Bedroom |
92.8% |
* |
* |
|
Bathroom
Remodel, Upscale |
92.6% |
91.0% |
1.6% |
|
Bathroom
Remodel, Mid-Range |
89.3% |
87.5% |
1.8% |
|
Window
Replacement, Upscale |
87.0% |
77.0% |
10.0% |
|
Window
Replacement, Mid-Range |
84.8% |
73.8% |
11.0% |
|
Bathroom
Addition, Upscale |
84.3% |
81.4% |
2.9% |
|
Family Room
Addition |
80.6% |
79.5% |
1.1% |
|
Major
Kitchen Remodel, Upscale |
79.6% |
79.8% |
-0.2% |
|
Basement
Remodel |
79.3% |
78.7% |
0.6% |
|
Master
Suite, Upscale |
76.9% |
76.8% |
0.1% |
|
Master
Suite, Mid-Range |
76.4% |
75.1% |
1.3% |
|
Major
Kitchen Remodel, Mid-Range |
74.9% |
66.6% |
8.3% |
|
*Not
included in the 2002 Report |
Cost data for the
Report come from HomeTech Information Systems, a remodeling
estimating software company in Bethesda, Md.
HomeTech collects current cost information quarterly from thousands
of contractors nationwide. The figures include markup and are
adjusted to account for pricing variations in different parts of the
country.
Resale values are
based on the professional judgment of members of the National
Association of Realtors (NAR). Surveys containing customized
cost-to-construct data for each city, as well as information on
median house prices, were sent via e-mail to appraisers, sales
agents, and brokers, who responded with dollar figures for each
remodeling project that represent the value the completed project
would add to the selling price of the house under current market
conditions.
In addition to
broadcasting the surveys to its membership, the NAR collected the
value data and tabulated the results.
A grain of salt
While the numbers
presented here can serve as guidelines when contemplating the
potential return on investment for a particular remodeling project,
it's important to acknowledge a variety of factors that can affect
both the cost of remodeling and the resale value of homes.
On the one hand,
costs for materials, subcontractors, and labor vary considerably,
not only in different parts of the country but among remodeling
companies operating in the same market. Overhead also varies, as
does a company's target customer. A small remodeler targeting
middle-class blue-collar families will find his customer's price
expectations differ considerably from those of a high-end
design/build firm with a white-collar clientele. In addition, some
project costs and values will appear too high or too low simply due
to the leveling effect of averaging.
There is even more
variation on the value side. Return on investment depends on the
value of the house itself, the value of similar homes in the
immediate area, and the rate at which property values are changing
in the surrounding neighborhoods. The same house in a different
neighborhood within the same city will vary considerably in value,
as will a house in a suburban location when compared with its rural
or urban counterpart.
Availability of
alternatives also has a bearing on a home's value. In Phoenix, for
example, people contemplating a remodeling project may find
everything they want in a new home, of which there is a steady and
easily accessible supply.
Remember also that
there is a difference between a house's value and its selling price.
In a hot market, buyers may pay more than market value to gain entry
to a particular neighborhood. Factors like commuting distance,
quality of schools, proximity to shopping, and cultural activities
all play a role in determining resale values.
Nonetheless, the
Cost vs. Value Report provides a guideline remodelers can use to
help their customers make decisions about the size and scope of the
projects described here. If resale value is a major factor in that
decision, the best course of action is to seek an assessment from a
real estate agent active in the particular neighborhood.
What's it worth?
Finally, the value
of any remodeling project includes elements that can't readily be
measured in dollars and cents. Unlike other kinds of investments --
stocks and bonds or bank CDs, for example -- people retain the use
of their money in the form of the remodeled space. This "utility
value" is difficult to quantify, but it is always present.
In some cases, the
benefits are tangible. Replacing windows, for instance, typically
results in added comfort as well as reduced energy costs. The same
is true of remodeling projects that include an upgrade of house
systems -- replacing HVAC equipment with more efficient models, for
example. And a kitchen remodel often includes upgraded appliances
that are both easier to use and more energy efficient.
Other benefits are
intangible but no less real. Adding a family room, for example, can
immeasurably improve the quality of life for a growing family with
young children. Likewise, increased storage in a new master suite
may free up space for an exercise room in another part of the house.
Taken together, the overall effect is reduced stress, increased
comfort, and improved physical and mental well-being.
And when the house
is finally sold, the equity is tax free. Few other investments can
make the same claim.
A Few Notes on
Cost Recovery
Kermit Baker, senior
research fellow at Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies,
offers three key observations about the 2003 Cost vs. Value Report.
1. Cost recovery
rates for home improvement projects remain high.
Despite the fact that growth in spending on home improvements has
been slowing nationally for most of 2003, cost recovery rates have
been accelerating. Across all projects covered in this study, the
average cost recouped was 86.4%. For virtually every project, this
was higher than in 2002. This probably reflects improvement in the
economy and in the sense that incomes will continue to increase over
the next few years.
2. Low-priced
projects are exhibiting higher cost recovery rates than high-priced
jobs. During a recession and
in the early stages of a recovery, it is typical that the upper end
of a market suffers more than the lower. High-priced projects tend
to be more discretionary, and households often want to wait for the
economy to improve to undertake these expenditures.
3. Markets with
high house price appreciations report higher-than-average cost
recovery. In markets where
house prices are growing rapidly, local economies are generally
doing better than the national average. Homeowners are more inclined
to spend on their homes, having more equity to undertake the
improvements and wanting to protect their housing investment. In
metropolitan areas that were in the top 50 nationally in terms of
house price appreciations between mid-2002 and mid-2003, the cost
recouped was much higher than the Report average of 86.4%. In these
areas (including, alphabetically, Los Angeles, Miami, New York,
Philadelphia, Providence, Sacramento, San Diego, and Washington,
D.C.), the average cost recouped was 109%. In metropolitan areas
that were in the bottom 50 nationally in terms of house price
appreciation (including, alphabetically, Cincinnati, Cleveland,
Dallas, Denver, Detroit, Indianapolis, Salt Lake City, and Seattle),
cost recovery across all projects in the Report averaged 65% or less
for every market except Seattle.
Call Today!
(540) 832-0688
Back to Mortgage Resources |